Debih, I did a bit of digging. It's not something I have looked at for a while and, honestly, I'm not impressed at what I am seeing in the market. It's like the days of Intel processor domination where you pay £100 for a tiny increment in power. Let me try and explain.
Screen size. Long, long, ago, the basic screen size was 1024x768. This is so small that you can't fit most web pages on it today. But all budget laptops had that size screen and it was truly awful to work with. However, back a decade or so, it was possible to get reasonable deals with decent increases of screen size for a reasonable amount more money.
Roll forward a decade or so and things have changed. 1024x768 has become 1280x768. Barely enough to get a webpage on. The reason it is not smaller is because Windows8 will not support a screen any smaller. My phone has a better resolution. However to get a decent resolution (1600x900) on a 15" screen, means paying between £700 and £1,000 and sometimes more.
CPU power. Here is another bewildering array. AMD or Intel. C series, E Series, A series for AMD, Pentium, Celeron, Corei3/5/7 Pentiums with D on the end, Celerons with D on the end..... By this time you are probably perplexed. Why don't they have a simple index to tell you how good they are.
Well they do. but, again, there are so many processors that it has to be split into
4 charts. the AMD E series is in the Low End. Near the top. You find the AMD A4/6 at the top of the low to mid chart. Then you get the Corei3, Corei5 and AMD A6 and A8 faster processors in the Hig mid range.
To save you the bother of trawling through the charts, unless you want to, forget the AMD chips. Their $ value price point for the faster processors (A8/10) is so high that unless you have a burning need for budget games performance graphics, they are not worth buying. ( I did so I have a netbook with an AMD E series so I know what I'm talking about here).
Personal experience tells me that Corei3 is just too slow even for normal browsing and Word/Excel work. My transition laptop when my old Fujitsu died, was a Dell which I upgraded from a Pentium to a Corei3. Even with one of the fastest hard drives going, the system is still slow.
So, from my experience, I would suggest you get a budget 17.3" laptop. These normally come with 1600x900 screen resolution (workable) and with a Corei5 come in around the £500 mark.
Next problem. Memory. Almost every machine sold today should be a 64bit machine. That means the operating system should say it's Windows8.1 64-Bit. Ok so now we've decided what the operating system should be, then what are we looking at in memory. In short, you could live with 4GB. But I can tell you that my work machine, 32bit with 4GB of RAM is constantly hitting the upper limits of memory. So if you want to buy a 4GB model, make sure that it can take a second memory DIMM. Then you have the choice of buying the DIMM at the same time as the machine and having your man from the shop install it, or adding it later.
Final problem. Hard drive. Now this is a specific bugbear of mine. Hard drives are one of the two biggest performance issues with older PC's. The first one is above, memory. It's probably #1 and a simple memory upgrade can fix around 60% of all performance issues with older machines. However the next major culprit is the hard drive. If you want a truly sprightly machine, then you need a SSD. However that has it's issues. Windows is not designed with SSD's in mind. It has swap files and intends to use them. This, over time, slowly consumes the entire SSD and then forces it to keep overwriting the same space over and over again. This is death for SSD's as they have a whole life read/write/erase cycle of 10,000. If you think about it, that's not a lot. Every SSD I have put into my machines has had to have remedial action taken to recover it somewhere between 18 months and 2 years. So I'm wary of recommending one. They are cheaper now and your usage is not quite like mine so it may be better.
So I'll give you two options for a fast machine. You said you don't need a lot of space. So here is what I do in your position.
I buy one of
these. This allows you somewhere to put the drive out of the old laptop and use it.
I then buy either a SSD or a hybrid drive. My main laptop has both for speed and space.
One of
these for SSD is good enough to make the machine supercharged in terms of disk.
Or one of
these will significantly improve performance over the long run. Note it's a lot cheaper and twice the space.
So, is there a machine which encompasses what I have stated and fits your budget?
Well, there is
this machine at the moment. I'm sure you'll have to search again when you get the expenses.
Memory? 4GB. But it has two slots, one empty
Screen? 17.3 1600x900
Processor? Core i5 and it's in the third fastest of the CPU benchmark chart, right up in the top 25. It is, in fact, more than 50% of the speed of the CPU in my £4,000 odd laptop.
Disk? Slow, very slow, 1TB drive.
Cost? £434.72 with a possibility of free delivery.
So what would I do? I'd buy the Second drive option (Seagate hybrid for £44.16) and the drive caddy I linked on ebay. Take them with the Laptop to your man and get him to image the internal drive to the hybrid. Then swap them over and put the original drive in the caddy. Put the caddy away for a year and if you have a breakdown, get the drives swapped over and send the original back.
That is how I work. It gives you a reasonable laptop, in your price range, with better performance, for the price you want to pay.
Sorry for the long ramble but a lot to explain about how I think and why. Simply put you do not get what you pay for unless you want either crap performance at £199 (cheapest Dell I saw), or excellent performance at £1,500.... The middle ground is a mire to take money from the unwary.
Oh and avoid cheap Toshiba's and Lenovo's. They are both using the bottom end AMD chips and the performance is somewhat similar to a windmill on a calm day....