Risk of disease.

A board for news and views on what's happening in the world

Re: Risk of disease.

Postby Workingman » 14 Feb 2014, 18:43

Experts are the last thing we need..... look what they have done for us so far! ;) :P
User avatar
Workingman
 
Posts: 21750
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 15:20

Re: Risk of disease.

Postby Diflower » 14 Feb 2014, 19:07

Nooo, I meant us armchair experts WM :lol:

I just read that for the town, one of the things they're doing is that the 'gates will be shut at the toll bridge' to hold the water - first either of us knew there was a toll bridge, but now we've looked up the road it's on, we do know where it is and have seen the gates :D
It's right by the level crossing so I guess the trains will be out again :)
User avatar
Diflower
 
Posts: 16148
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 22:10

Re: Risk of disease.

Postby Kaz » 14 Feb 2014, 19:33

I asked my armchair expert! Apparently they did open the sluices at Maidenhead - it saved Maidenhead but that has meant Chertsey and Staines paying the price!

Ria, Mick reckons the reason they don't do what you suggest is because of the tiny chance it might flood the capital.....something nobody would risk.....
User avatar
Kaz
 
Posts: 43354
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 21:02
Location: Gloucester

Re: Risk of disease.

Postby cromwell » 14 Feb 2014, 19:42

I would! Do it as the tide turns and it should all be taken out to sea?
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored" - Aldous Huxley
cromwell
 
Posts: 9157
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 12:46
Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire.

Re: Risk of disease.

Postby Workingman » 14 Feb 2014, 20:00

cromwell wrote:I would! Do it as the tide turns and it should all be taken out to sea?


What, London, Westminster??

Every cloud.... and all that.
User avatar
Workingman
 
Posts: 21750
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 15:20

Re: Risk of disease.

Postby cromwell » 14 Feb 2014, 20:02

If that happens a sincere "Ooops!" should cover it. :)
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored" - Aldous Huxley
cromwell
 
Posts: 9157
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 12:46
Location: Wakefield, West Yorkshire.

Re: Risk of disease.

Postby meriad » 14 Feb 2014, 20:48

Kaz wrote:Ria, Mick reckons the reason they don't do what you suggest is because of the tiny chance it might flood the capital.....something nobody would risk.....


I also suspect that is the reason why :(

but surely there must be a way to do a controlled and slow release of the water upstream, esp when the tidal Thames is ebbing, London wouldn't flood then.

But :lol: :lol: Cromwell and Frank.
User avatar
meriad
 
Posts: 9411
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 09:42
Location: Send, Surrey

Re: Risk of disease.

Postby Kaz » 14 Feb 2014, 21:08

There should be Ria but that would require both brains and leadership!! :? :roll: :roll:

Frank, Cromwell - watching the HoP floating out to sea eh???? That would pull in an audience :P :lol: :lol: :geek:
User avatar
Kaz
 
Posts: 43354
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 21:02
Location: Gloucester

Re: Risk of disease.

Postby Aggers » 14 Feb 2014, 22:56

Don't despair.

As politicians say, "There are lessons to be learned".
Aggers
 

Re: Risk of disease.

Postby KateLMead » 15 Feb 2014, 08:03

What worries me are the risks of gastroenteritis, typhoid and other communicable diseases that can be caused through sewage and indeed floods. We have been warned of the danger to our dogs, ensuring they do not enter water and saturated fields. All our dogs have been very sick and have had costly injections and treatment from the vets, we took them to the woods or a local field every day for exercise.
User avatar
KateLMead
 
Posts: 2407
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 12:11

PreviousNext

Return to News and Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 112 guests