miasmum wrote:Workingman wrote:No. But it's apples and pears and Starmer is neither in No10 nor the PM nor making the rules, and I have never voted for his lot.
Ahh I see so as long as you're not Prime Minister or making the rules you can do what you like? Isn't that called anarchy? I bet all those fined for having indoor gatherings, dont feel quite as benevolent
They don't feel benevolence to anyone, hence the anger at Boris, they got fined £000s, he didn't. It's rage!
From what I have read, Starmer and five others were working on a by-election campaign in a small constituency office with no cooking facilities. They ordered in food and drinks and took a break then continued working into the small hours.
Yes, the food and drinks part was wrong, but the rules at the time did allow people from different households to mix for work. In that respect no rules were broken. For the break they should have shut up shop and gone to a restaurant / pub and sat outside for a meal and a drink - that was in the rules.
The events are not the same. It was a misdemeanour, and a minor one in comparison with the now admitted Downing St parties (plural).
Re Cummings: he is doing what he is doing. I do not particularly like it, but I do understand it.