Four days since we were told that the new "mutant" strain of covid was 50% more infectious that the old one.
The next day it grew to 70%.
Then Macron shut the borders.
And all of a sudden the new strain was just "more infectious".
In fact the government and their scientists overdid the scaremongering this time didn't they? It backfired on them big time.
Because the longer this drags on the more obvious some things become.
Namely that the aim was always lockdown until April at least. Once the policy is decided you need evidence to support it - usually most thinking organisations do it the other way round, evidence then policy, but I digress.
Exaggeration and outright lies have been the standout for me.
500,000 deaths.
Cases may double every day.
4,000 deaths a day - A graph used to justify the 4,000 figure was later admitted by the government to be inaccurate.
Figures used to justify the tiered lockdown in November were quietly revised downwards as reported by the Telegraph on 8th December.
Then we have the downright lie. Grant Shapps saying that 50% of hospital beds in London are taken by Covid patients. They aren't.
The figure of 70% more infectious comes from our old chum, Professor Neil Ferguson.
Here is a quick rundown of the Prof's record on predictions of deaths in previous crises.
Foot and mouth 2001. Prediction 150,000 deaths. Reality less than 200.
BSE 2002. Prediction 50,000 deaths. Reality 177.
Bird flu 2005. Predicted 150,000,000 deaths. Reality 282.
Swine flu 2009. Predicted deaths 65,000. Reality 457.
This is the man who also incidentally is supposed to have "resigned" from all government positions / advisory work in May after being caught out breaking his own rules.
Well he's back working for a "sub committee" of SAGE called NERVTAG.
And this to me is the never mentioned scandal of the pandemic.
A government who decide a policy and deny that they have.
Scientific advisors who knowingly give out exaggerated estimates of the death rate using dodgy graphs and inaccurate, out of date information.
Scientific advisors who resign and then get back in.
Politicians who are too weak to point this out.
Politicians who are too incompetent to do a cost / benefit analysis. Damage to the economy? Silence. Damage to the health of patients other than covid? Silence.
And when the next lie, exaggeration or proclamation from a proven incompetent comes along, they'll expect us to believe it.