I can see both sides. Some schoolkids are drama queens, always have been. But there does seem to be an anxiousness industry that is always being quoted by the TV news, and imo this encourages self introspection.
Also a few years ago in schools an initiative called PSED was introduced. This stands for Personal, Social and Emotional Development.
A big part of PSED was self confidence and self awareness and managing feelings and relationships.
Many teachers in this country (including MrsC) thought this was going to be counter productive. Indeed in America where PSED originated there had already been warnings that making children concentrate on themselves and asking if they were happy might be overly stressing developing young minds.
And imo she was right and encouraging self introspection and constantly questioning if you are all right is going to lead in an unnecessary rise in anxiety in children, and we are seeing the results of PSED right now.
Workingman wrote:When and how did we all become so emotionally weak?
Tbh Frank I think it is official policy to encourage us to be cry babies, and it has been for years. The people who run the country don't want a population of bright, inquiring minds. They want a population of docile dependents.
You can see this most plainly in the fallacy that it is only the government that can "keep you safe". The more people believe that - and it is pushed at you all the time - the more people become frightened and dependent.
It also leads to an erosion of personal liberties. Give up your right to own a pistol - it will keep you safe. No bad things will ever happen again. Give up your right to free speech - it encourages dangerous racism and that is dangerous.
You mustn't "take the law into your own hands" as it is the governments job to keep you safe from crims. Given the police cuts this is a fairly obvious lie, but there you go.
Workingman wrote:All the stories appear to be making matters worse as everyone "empathises" with everyone else. We have entered a period of collective social mania and, of course, the mental health experts are clamouring for funds to mitigate the impending future disaster. To me they are actually feeding the problem.
Yes, and they are doing it deliberately to big themselves up.
Empathy is an interesting one. I read once that the only feeling that should be occuring to us re migrants was empathy. That we should just feel sorry for them.
This is a great get out for politicians if they can manage it.
It is akin to taking your brain out, putting it into a box, locking the box and handing the keys to a politician.
No thank you.
I had an on line conversation with someone who refused to believe that if we let in 500,000 people per year, that it would have any effect on the need for housing. Absolutely refused to admit it. Why? Because such an attitude might be racist, and racism is bad.
So the conditioned response (racism is bad) trumps the rational thought of the law of supply and demand.
Just be empathetic.
Right! All that said there are people who are struggling. One of our neighbours lost her husband recently. She has a great attitude, but she does get down and she is dreading the thought of not being able to see her family at Christmas if we get a lockdown.
The people who are struggling are probably mostly like that. Good people who have followed the rules but still get threatened with draconian penalties that affect the ordinary small pleasures which make their lives worth living.
People who are separated from, or who fear being separated from, their children and grandchildren; people whose only conversation is with a shop assistant. People who have been scared witless by the relentless doom and gloom coming out of the TV and papers for the last seven months.
I have a lot of sympathy for them. For the "Oooh, people don't understand - I have anxiety" brigade, not so much.