by Suff » 12 Dec 2015, 04:57
Personally I have tried it and have no illusions as to what it is. Yes it does pictures today but that, ever more so, is something I have no intention of ever using.
I find people are aghast, these days, that I don't have a FB page. Many think that I'm a dinosaur and haven't kept up with the times. Nothing could be further from the truth. I was one of the first few million on facebook until I deleted my account. Notably when I signed up to facebook you could tell it you were Donald Duck or Saddam Hussain and it would quite happily say "hello Donald" when you logged in.
Over the years that I had FB I decided that it was simply something that I did not need and was just a route for utter garbage and trivia to enter my life. So I deleted it. Note, not the deactivate they offer on their site but the "Delete" which you can only find by doing a Google Search.
Somewhere on my LinkedIn site I am a member of the first million users to the site. In fact I had to re-register for Linked in when I lost one of my email addresses. I was one of the first thousand because a colleague of mine was friends with one of the founders.
Twitter I avoided for quite a long time. Averse as I am to text messages, there is little chance that I will use that information medium for my day to day life.
But there is a much more important fact here. When Aggers mailed the police and asked them about their services he was sent to their twitter account. Twitter is a "real time feed" which you can also see historical "tweets". For someone, like me, who makes their life out of corporate information systems where we have to interact with the community, twitter is nothing more than a joke. Twitter is only good for announcing information, the home for that information needs to be a "place" (website, online community, call it what you want), where people can go, view, research and understand.
Trawling through real time short text "announcements" for services is one of the worst possible forms of communication I have ever been involved in. This is my business and I have been doing it for more than two decades now. E-Mail is bad enough, but instant messaging for vital services? I've seen companies struggle with this time and time again. I've watched IBM fall over with Connections, Google try to do "Good FB", I currently have a POS at work called Pulse+. All of them claim to be "Social" and "better than the rest".
I don't see lack of understanding here so much as lack of acceptance. In this case lack of acceptance, for me, works. Tweeting changes to the council bin service this week is fine, if all your catchment area is on twitter. Tweeting your entire council service plan, service offering and structure of your services is a joke and a bad one at that.
So called "Social" media is impossibly immature right now. It will morph into many different branches over the following years and there will be many dead ends on the way. Those of us who lived "Web 1.0" and the dot com boom on mobile "Telephones" which did "Dial Up" internet and WAP websites (cWAP as I call it), understand this very well. Web 2.0 may be here but it's still an infant taking it's first steps.
I won't live to see what our social network becomes eventually, but I have few illusions as to what it is today.
There are 10 types of people in the world:
Those who understand Binary and those who do not.