PIPPA P.OFF

A place to chat with friends, old and new

PIPPA P.OFF

Postby KateLMead » 07 Sep 2013, 09:08

I am sick to death of seeing the face of Pippa. on front pages middle pages and elsewhere.. Cook books? she cant cook. Parties organised by her. No Thanks. Regalia cheap and nasty made in Bangladesh and elsewhere by women struggling to survive, Mums business. Her un-interesting love life.
More news of interest should be on front pages, like the cruel snatching of women's babies who are considered of low intelligence ..True facts about what is going on in Syria and elsewhere. News News News, not trash..
What a sick lot they have working in journalism the trashier the stories as far as these apologies for reporters are concerned the better..
She and the press are doing no favours for Kate and William, and neither are her parents and sister with their greed for publicity
User avatar
KateLMead
 
Posts: 2407
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 12:11

Re: PIPPA P.OFF

Postby pederito1 » 07 Sep 2013, 09:32

I thought it was her bottom that is being publicised, Kate, rather than her face. There could be people around who might just like looking at that. :)
pederito1
 

Re: PIPPA P.OFF

Postby Rodo » 07 Sep 2013, 09:37

Waitrose soon got fed up of her and reinstated Delia.
Rodo
 

Re: PIPPA P.OFF

Postby Diflower » 07 Sep 2013, 10:04

I hardly ever see her.
No paper here except the Saturday Times, I don't think she's in there. Oh, and I bought the 'I' while I was waiting in the hospital the other day, she wasn't in that either.
I don't have anything against her though, she works for a living and always has done; it's hardly her fault if the papers choose to print pictures of her :?
Maybe you're just buying the wrong papers Kate ;)
User avatar
Diflower
 
Posts: 16148
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 22:10

Re: PIPPA P.OFF

Postby cruiser2 » 07 Sep 2013, 11:35

But would she have got as much publicity if her sister was not married to a future king? She only showed her a**e so that she got maximum coverage and would be remembered. Anybody else would have been more discrete.
Why all the publicity about her hockey teacher? It must have happened to many pupils at other schools which have never had the same outcome.
cruiser2
 

Re: PIPPA P.OFF

Postby Rodo » 07 Sep 2013, 11:50

I agree Cruiser, that hockey teacher article was totally unnecessary. I read a while ago that she had been asked by the Palace to tone down her activities - she obviously took no notice.
Rodo
 

Re: PIPPA P.OFF

Postby Workingman » 07 Sep 2013, 11:53

There are some newspapers and magazines I would never buy, and there are sections of other newspapers and websites I would never read......... so I never get to know about all this fascinating and exciting stuff. :o :shock: :roll:

That's why I am such a dull boy. ;) :-P :lol: :lol: :lol: 8-)
User avatar
Workingman
 
Posts: 21745
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 15:20

Re: PIPPA P.OFF

Postby KateLMead » 07 Sep 2013, 12:20

:-P :-P :-P :-P :-P hardly a dull boy!!!
User avatar
KateLMead
 
Posts: 2407
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 12:11

Re: PIPPA P.OFF

Postby Kaz » 07 Sep 2013, 14:48

LOL Same as Di and Frank, I steer clear of gossip mags and red top tabloids - so am thankfully in blissful ignorance of the antics of Ms. Middleton and her famous *rse ;) :-P :lol: :lol: :lol:

:D
User avatar
Kaz
 
Posts: 43349
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 21:02
Location: Gloucester

Re: PIPPA P.OFF

Postby KateLMead » 08 Sep 2013, 07:25

She is an exhibitionist of the worst kind.. no one is interested in this nonentity any more than they are interested in the Middleton's as a family.. The behaviour of madam Pippa reflects badly on the family in general.
"Poor Kate" memories come forth of the exploitation of Dianna and the part the press played in her miserable short life and Ferge.
User avatar
KateLMead
 
Posts: 2407
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 12:11

Next

Return to Cafe

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 228 guests