Aggers wrote:I think it would be a good idea to have records of every person's DNA profile.
Think how it would simplify many crime investigations.
After all, we don't want criminals, do we?
Aggers my son and daughter in law are in the Police. From what they tell me about how "crimefighting" is currently being applied, the last thing we need is guilt by proximity proven by DNA. DNA does not have an expiry date at the scene of a crime, they can't tell how long it has been there. One thing if it is on the body, another if someone picks up an innocuous object you happened to pick up with saliva on your hand and then kills someone with it...
I don't want to go there any more than I want to go with chipping. However, like an ID card, I can see human chipping being mandatory within two centuries. After all, if you told someone from the UK in 1900 that they would have to have papers and carry them with them everywhere you went, they would look at you as if you were mad. Yet Gordon Brown almost made it a reality. Another reason for not voting for the incompetents...
Times change.