So far so good.
Then we also have the curious case of AFC Stoneham FC, a non-descript Step 5 Wessex League club based in Eastleigh with probably around 100 regular fans, who have signed up to move in September into a brand-new £9m (I think) sports complex on the edge of town. I'm interested because I could at a pinch walk it from Southampton Airport Parkway station, but there's a snag. This stadium is operated by the Hampshire Football Association in conjunction with the FA ParkLife scheme, which may or may not be based in Liverpool, but I digress. To enter the ground to watch an AFC Stoneham game, versus say Shaftesbury or Brockenhurst, you have to be "pre-registered". You have to have gone on-line with the Hants FA, completed a form, and been furnished with your own individual QR Code. This you will need to download to your mobile phone, and show it at the gate to gain entry. The reason for this is so that the FA "can better understand" how you are using its facilities, and (in the small print) to ensure compliance with safeguarding standards. And that applies to everybody - home players and supporters, away team players, management and fans, casual soccer fans like me who'll probably only intend to visit the damned place once, even the guy selling the pasties.
Now you may think these two examples are actually quite good ideas, but my question is - is this the thin edge of an extremely large wedge and where will it all finish up? How long before you going to have to pre-register to visit your local park? How long before you have to register to visit your local pub? Are we now seriously going the Chinese Society route?
Personally, I find all this "active" surveillance (as compared to passive CCTV for example) extremely intrusive. And I won't be going to watch AFC Stoneham, largely because I have no idea how to download a QR Code onto a mobile phone even if I wanted to
