Are we really this stupid?
Posted: 02 Dec 2014, 22:20
Or are things made up?
The news services have been running stories about phone scams costing us £millions. The BBC's version featured a couple who looked quite ordinary in their well decorated living room.
The story went that their "Bank" phoned them to say that it was suspected their bank cards had been hacked. He then, for security purposes, gave them a number to ring their "bank" to have the problem checked. They ring* the number and another voice answers. For security purposes he asks them for the first line of their address and then their postcode. He confirms that their answers are correct and then tells them to try to enter their account by entering the PIN on the phone key pad. This apparently does not work and confirms the hack of their card. Now he tells them that XYZ couriers will be round to collect their hacked card and that a new one will be in the post, but, he warns them, they must check the driver's ID.
Not long after XYZ couriers are at the door, they check his ID and hand over their cards. A few days later they find themselves lighter by £1,800.
It might be me, but I cannot believe that anyone sensible enough to have a bank account would fall for such rubbish. I am more inclined to believe that this is a made up scenario.
*Ring back. It is an age old trick on landlines, especially cordless phones. I ring you and tell you to ring another number. You hang up but I don't - this keeps the connection open. You put in the number on you phone's key pad and hear the blips as each number is entered, but by the time you get the phone to your ear I am either playing a dial up tone or I answer straight away. You did not 'ring' a new number you simply carried on our conversation from before.
The news services have been running stories about phone scams costing us £millions. The BBC's version featured a couple who looked quite ordinary in their well decorated living room.
The story went that their "Bank" phoned them to say that it was suspected their bank cards had been hacked. He then, for security purposes, gave them a number to ring their "bank" to have the problem checked. They ring* the number and another voice answers. For security purposes he asks them for the first line of their address and then their postcode. He confirms that their answers are correct and then tells them to try to enter their account by entering the PIN on the phone key pad. This apparently does not work and confirms the hack of their card. Now he tells them that XYZ couriers will be round to collect their hacked card and that a new one will be in the post, but, he warns them, they must check the driver's ID.
Not long after XYZ couriers are at the door, they check his ID and hand over their cards. A few days later they find themselves lighter by £1,800.
It might be me, but I cannot believe that anyone sensible enough to have a bank account would fall for such rubbish. I am more inclined to believe that this is a made up scenario.
*Ring back. It is an age old trick on landlines, especially cordless phones. I ring you and tell you to ring another number. You hang up but I don't - this keeps the connection open. You put in the number on you phone's key pad and hear the blips as each number is entered, but by the time you get the phone to your ear I am either playing a dial up tone or I answer straight away. You did not 'ring' a new number you simply carried on our conversation from before.