Who would have been in the wrong
Posted: 21 Sep 2013, 13:48
I was driving along, as you do, when I got to a fairly sharp corner, not quite but very close to about a 90 degree angle, which means you have to drive around it fairly slow; so definitely not exceeding the speed limit. As I was just coming round the corner there was a guy - in my lane - reversing back up the road; I suspect he wanted to turn off into a road that was off to the right but had missed the turning so just stopped and figured he could reverse.
If it wasn't for the fact that the oncoming lane was empty which allowed me to swerve out the way I am fairly certain I'd have rear ended him; as it was I managed to get passed, the car behind me managed to slam on brakes and stop, and I (thankfully successfully) indicated to oncoming traffic to slow down.
But if I had hit him, who would have been to blame. Usually it's the person who goes into the back of another car, but in this situation would that still apply?
If it wasn't for the fact that the oncoming lane was empty which allowed me to swerve out the way I am fairly certain I'd have rear ended him; as it was I managed to get passed, the car behind me managed to slam on brakes and stop, and I (thankfully successfully) indicated to oncoming traffic to slow down.
But if I had hit him, who would have been to blame. Usually it's the person who goes into the back of another car, but in this situation would that still apply?