Page 1 of 2

PIPPA P.OFF

PostPosted: 07 Sep 2013, 09:08
by KateLMead
I am sick to death of seeing the face of Pippa. on front pages middle pages and elsewhere.. Cook books? she cant cook. Parties organised by her. No Thanks. Regalia cheap and nasty made in Bangladesh and elsewhere by women struggling to survive, Mums business. Her un-interesting love life.
More news of interest should be on front pages, like the cruel snatching of women's babies who are considered of low intelligence ..True facts about what is going on in Syria and elsewhere. News News News, not trash..
What a sick lot they have working in journalism the trashier the stories as far as these apologies for reporters are concerned the better..
She and the press are doing no favours for Kate and William, and neither are her parents and sister with their greed for publicity

Re: PIPPA P.OFF

PostPosted: 07 Sep 2013, 09:32
by pederito1
I thought it was her bottom that is being publicised, Kate, rather than her face. There could be people around who might just like looking at that. :)

Re: PIPPA P.OFF

PostPosted: 07 Sep 2013, 09:37
by Rodo
Waitrose soon got fed up of her and reinstated Delia.

Re: PIPPA P.OFF

PostPosted: 07 Sep 2013, 10:04
by Diflower
I hardly ever see her.
No paper here except the Saturday Times, I don't think she's in there. Oh, and I bought the 'I' while I was waiting in the hospital the other day, she wasn't in that either.
I don't have anything against her though, she works for a living and always has done; it's hardly her fault if the papers choose to print pictures of her :?
Maybe you're just buying the wrong papers Kate ;)

Re: PIPPA P.OFF

PostPosted: 07 Sep 2013, 11:35
by cruiser2
But would she have got as much publicity if her sister was not married to a future king? She only showed her a**e so that she got maximum coverage and would be remembered. Anybody else would have been more discrete.
Why all the publicity about her hockey teacher? It must have happened to many pupils at other schools which have never had the same outcome.

Re: PIPPA P.OFF

PostPosted: 07 Sep 2013, 11:50
by Rodo
I agree Cruiser, that hockey teacher article was totally unnecessary. I read a while ago that she had been asked by the Palace to tone down her activities - she obviously took no notice.

Re: PIPPA P.OFF

PostPosted: 07 Sep 2013, 11:53
by Workingman
There are some newspapers and magazines I would never buy, and there are sections of other newspapers and websites I would never read......... so I never get to know about all this fascinating and exciting stuff. :o :shock: :roll:

That's why I am such a dull boy. ;) :-P :lol: :lol: :lol: 8-)

Re: PIPPA P.OFF

PostPosted: 07 Sep 2013, 12:20
by KateLMead
:-P :-P :-P :-P :-P hardly a dull boy!!!

Re: PIPPA P.OFF

PostPosted: 07 Sep 2013, 14:48
by Kaz
LOL Same as Di and Frank, I steer clear of gossip mags and red top tabloids - so am thankfully in blissful ignorance of the antics of Ms. Middleton and her famous *rse ;) :-P :lol: :lol: :lol:

:D

Re: PIPPA P.OFF

PostPosted: 08 Sep 2013, 07:25
by KateLMead
She is an exhibitionist of the worst kind.. no one is interested in this nonentity any more than they are interested in the Middleton's as a family.. The behaviour of madam Pippa reflects badly on the family in general.
"Poor Kate" memories come forth of the exploitation of Dianna and the part the press played in her miserable short life and Ferge.