Strictly 3rd Nov

TV, Films, Books - chat about them all here

Re: Strictly 3rd Nov

Postby TheOstrich » 04 Nov 2013, 11:51

Sophie has really got to up her game, the last two weeks' dances have been pretty dismal. In a way, perhaps she peaked too soon with that Charleston ....
User avatar
TheOstrich
 
Posts: 7642
Joined: 29 Nov 2012, 20:18
Location: North Dorset

Re: Strictly 3rd Nov

Postby Osc » 05 Nov 2013, 11:52

I think it was actually time Rachel went, to be honest, she would not be the first celeb to leave the week they do their best dance. I do think Dave should be gone by now and I cannot stand his partner Karen, far too full of herself. Still don't like Natalie, she has all the technical ability, has had from day one which makes you wonder about the fairness of it, but she acts as if she knows she is the best, and does not put anything of herself into the various dances. Technically excellent but no soul. I'd love to see Sophie step it up a bit, looking cool is all very well but it needs more.
User avatar
Osc
 
Posts: 8565
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 22:59
Location: Howth, Co. Dublin, Ireland.

Re: Strictly 3rd Nov

Postby Aggers » 05 Nov 2013, 15:04

I must admit that I am getting a bit fed-up the voting farce.

The show itself is quite entertaining but, to me, it is getting more like ITV than BBC.

I wish the BBC sound engineers would balance up the inputs from the various microphones.
The input from those positioned to pick up audience sounds is often too loud and make if
difficult to hear what is being said. (and why do the audience shout and scream so much? --
what's happened to good old-fashioned applause?)
Aggers
 

Re: Strictly 3rd Nov

Postby Lozzles » 05 Nov 2013, 17:51

I'm with you Aggers. I also wish people would be allowed to dance without everyone cheering. Cheer at the end of the dance if you want to, but all the way through? :roll:
Image
User avatar
Lozzles
 
Posts: 4483
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 09:15

Re: Strictly 3rd Nov

Postby miasmum » 05 Nov 2013, 19:52

I agree too, it is getting more ITV than BBC

Osc, I completely agree with your comments about Natalie. 8-)
User avatar
miasmum
 
Posts: 8477
Joined: 25 Nov 2012, 23:03

Re: Strictly 3rd Nov

Postby Fugitive » 08 Nov 2013, 17:35

Lozzles wrote:I'm with you Aggers. I also wish people would be allowed to dance without everyone cheering. Cheer at the end of the dance if you want to, but all the way through? :roll:


There's a brilliant band, excellent vocalists who do justice to the original chosen song, the dancers who have practiced and practiced keeping in time to the beat and then the audience claps to the rhythm but that is what the band is for to keep time and that awful clapping is a horrid distraction. And if Hairy Biker doesn't go this week something dodgy is going on :evil:
User avatar
Fugitive
 
Posts: 757
Joined: 26 Nov 2012, 08:27

Re: Strictly 3rd Nov

Postby Aggers » 08 Nov 2013, 19:13

Fugitive wrote:There's a brilliant band, excellent vocalists who do justice to the original chosen song, the dancers who have practiced and practiced keeping in time to the beat and then the audience claps to the rhythm but that is what the band is for to keep time and that awful clapping is a horrid distraction.


I agree that the band is good, but I don't think that there should be vocalists when playing for ballroom dancing
because very few singers can keep strict timing, which is of vital importance for dancing.

The clapping is unnecessary, too, and should not be allowed. The time for clapping is at the conclusion of a number.
Aggers
 

Previous

Return to Entertainment

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests